# Pieter Jan De Smet Calculations

Various topics in mathematics and physics

## Sunday, November 12, 2017

### Extended solutions for the biadjoint scalar field

Chris D. White and I recently published a paper with new solutions for the biadjoint scalar field: link to Arxiv, link to Physics Letter B.

## Thursday, October 5, 2017

### Girsanov for dummies

In quantitative finance, one uses
change of numÃ©raire, also known as
Girsanov's theorem.
In this post I explain this concept in a very simple situation. In practice, I find that this "Girsanov's theorem for dummies" version is good enough
for most calculations.

## Friday, July 14, 2017

### Covariant Taylor Series

I recently saw for the first time formulas that are covariant versions of Taylor series. Because they are not easy to find on the internet, I write some down here. Suppose $x_0$ and $x_1$ are two points on a manifold, then the covariant Taylor series are formulas like
\begin{align*}
f(x_1) &= f(x_0) + f_{;\mu}(x_0)\, \eta^{\mu} + \dfrac{1}{2}f_{;\mu\nu}(x_0)\, \eta^{\mu}\eta^{\nu} + O(\eta)^3\\
T_{\mu}(x_1) &= T_{\mu}(x_0) + T_{\mu;\alpha}(x_0)\, \eta^{\alpha} +
\dfrac{1}{2}\left( T_{\mu;\alpha\beta}(x_0)+\dfrac{1}{3} R^{\sigma}_{\ \ \alpha\beta\mu}(x_0)\, T_{\sigma}(x_0)\right) \eta^{\alpha}\eta^{\beta} + O(\eta)^3
\end{align*}
The semi-colon denotes the covariant derivative with the Levi-Civita connection. The vector $\eta^{\mu}$ is defined as follows: take a geodesic $\gamma(t)$ such that $\gamma(0) = x_0$ and $\gamma(1) = x_1$, then $\eta^{\mu} = \dot\gamma^{\mu}(0)$. The higher coefficients in the series expansion become more and more complicated formulas involving the Riemann tensor and its covariant derivatives. The formulas can be proved using normal coordinates.

More information can be found in "The Background Field Method and the Ultraviolet Structure of the Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model", by Alvarez-Gaume, Freedman, Mukhi, 1981

More information can be found in "The Background Field Method and the Ultraviolet Structure of the Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model", by Alvarez-Gaume, Freedman, Mukhi, 1981

## Monday, June 26, 2017

### Wu-Yang monopole: numerical calculation

I have been reading the paper by Wu and Yang [1] in which they find the famous Wu-Yang monopole.
In the paper there are solutions for three types of monopoles: one has an analytical form, which is the one most often quoted, but there are also two other monopoles with numerical solution only. In this post I use Python/numpy to perform numerical analysis on the latter solution. I use the same notation as in [1].

Wu and Yang obtain the following system of ordinary differential equations \begin{align} \frac{d\Phi}{d \xi} &= \psi\label{eq:20170625a}\\ \frac{d\psi}{d \xi} &= \psi + \Phi(\Phi^2-1)\label{eq:20170626a} \end{align} Here $\xi$ is given by $r = e^{\xi}$, with $r$ the distance to the origin. The right-hand side of \eqref{eq:20170625a}-\eqref{eq:20170626a} defines the vector field ($d\Phi/d\xi, d\psi/d\xi)$ in the $(\Phi, \psi)$ plane. Its integral curves can be seen in the next figure

I calculate the integral curve from the point $(\Phi,\psi) = (0,0)$ to $(1,0)$ using the numpy function

$\Phi(\xi)$ can be seen in the next graph. One sees that $\Phi(\xi) \to 0$ for $\xi \to -\infty$ and $\Phi(\xi) \to 1$ for $\xi \to +\infty$

In the rest of this post I reproduce part of Table 1 in [1].

Wu and Yang obtain the following system of ordinary differential equations \begin{align} \frac{d\Phi}{d \xi} &= \psi\label{eq:20170625a}\\ \frac{d\psi}{d \xi} &= \psi + \Phi(\Phi^2-1)\label{eq:20170626a} \end{align} Here $\xi$ is given by $r = e^{\xi}$, with $r$ the distance to the origin. The right-hand side of \eqref{eq:20170625a}-\eqref{eq:20170626a} defines the vector field ($d\Phi/d\xi, d\psi/d\xi)$ in the $(\Phi, \psi)$ plane. Its integral curves can be seen in the next figure

The integral curves of the vector field defined by \eqref{eq:20170625a}-\eqref{eq:20170626a}. The stationary points are marked in red. |

`solve_bvp`

[2].
The integral curves of the vector field defined by \eqref{eq:20170625a}-\eqref{eq:20170626a}. The integral curve from the stationary point $(0,0)$ to $(1,0)$ is added in red. |

## Monday, May 1, 2017

### Variance of Markov Chain Monte Carlo

In
a previous post, I discussed the bias of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. In this post I will discuss the variance. Please see the previous post for information about the notation that I use.

If \begin{equation*} S =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^N f(X_t) \end{equation*} then for large $N$, the variance of $S$ is

If \begin{equation*} S =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^N f(X_t) \end{equation*} then for large $N$, the variance of $S$ is

## Friday, April 28, 2017

### Bias in Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation can be used to calculate sums
\begin{equation}\label{eq:20170427a}
I = \sum_a \pi_a f(a)
\end{equation}
One finds a Markov process $X_t$ with stationary distribution $\pi_a$, then the sum \eqref{eq:20170427a} is approximated by
\begin{equation*}
S =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^N f(X_t)
\end{equation*}
One can prove that under certain assumptions,
\begin{equation*}
\lim_{N \to \infty} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^N f(X_t) = \sum_a \pi_a f(a)
\end{equation*}
This is Birkhoff's ergodic theorem. In this post I illustrate the behaviour of $ES$ for large $N$.

## Wednesday, March 8, 2017

### A calculation on moduli stabilization

In section 21.6 "Moduli stabilization and the landscape" in Zwiebach's
string theory book, I read the sentence "Deriving the potential $V(R)$ associated with $R$ is a straightforward but technical calculation in general relativity". At this point I did not understand what the calculation was. I vaguely remembered a paper by Witten about instabilities in Kaluza-Klein spacetimes related to instantons. A calculation with instantons is indeed technical, but perhaps straightforward for experts. I found more information in a paper by Denef [1]. The calculation has nothing to do with instantons, but is indeed a straightforward calculation in differential geometry. In the rest of this blog post I set out the calculation in the form of a new exercise for Zwiebach's book.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)